« February 03, 2008 - February 09, 2008 | Main | February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008 »
February 16, 2008
Does Winning Mean "Winning"?
Not according to Mark "My Head Is So Far Up My Ass It's Coming Out My Neck" Penn. Here's Penn's latest lobbying effort to get himself heavily medicated and/or force Hillary Clinton onto the Democratic party:
“Winning Democratic primaries is not a qualification or a sign of who can win the general election. If it were, every nominee would win because every nominee wins Democratic primaries.”
Okay, in the true spirit of Clintonian politics, let's parse that quote, shall we? Penn is saying:
1. Winning Democratic primaries DOES NOT MEAN you can win the general election and THUS
2. The implication is that the person who gets the most votes, most delegates, most states in the Democratic primary actually SHOULD NOT BE the nominee because the nominee won't win. THEREFORE:
3. What the DNC should do is actually nominate the person who gets fewer votes/delegates/states in the primary process.
Okay, okay, Mark. Bring on Democratic Nominee Joe Biden!
10:20 PM | Comments (1) | Posted By JumpyPants
I'm So Stupid!
I caught the first segment of Jim Cramer last night in which Governor Eliot Spitzer (D-NY) was the guest (via phone) to discuss this insane economic clusterfuck which the Bush Republicans and the Rand Free Market Anarchists have created for us. I learned three things during this segment of television:
1) Governor Spitzer is a very smart man.
2) Governor Spitzer spoke at great length and speed about things I'll never understand.
3) Spitzer and Cramer ripped both the president and Ayn Rand at the end of the conversation. I enjoyed and understood this part.
I'll never fully grasp the intricacies of this crap. But I do understand enough about the economic philosophies that caused it. Cramer and Spitzer (and Thom Hartmann and Atrios and all the rest) are doing their damndest to expose and repair the filthy, destructive contrails of the administration's laissez faire economic policies, but I'm afraid that Ayn Rand is alive and well and running wild like a psycho-bomb through the American economy.
Rand's free market capitalism, by its very nature, functions outside the realms of democratic accountability and so my basic worry comes down to this: can anyone contain the madness? Can anyone bottle this thing up again? And whoever tries it -- whoever tries to re-impose regulations on these bond insurers, banks, lenders and corporations -- what dastardly, vicious, well-financed opposing forces will they confront?
Happy weekend!
09:09 AM | Comments (1) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Morning Awesome
08:56 AM | Comments (0) | Posted By Bob Cesca
February 15, 2008
Special Comment
Regarding Olbermann's FISA special comment from last night, Jane Hamsher noted this passage in which Olbermann quoted Senator Kennedy. This is the heart of the issue:
The President has said that American lives will be sacrificed if Congress does not change FISA. But he has also said that he will veto any FISA bill that does not grant retroactive immunity. No immunity, no new FISA bill. So if we take the President at his word, he is willing to let Americans die to protect the phone companies.
That is beautiful. Kennedy via Olbermann summarized in three sentences what most of us have yet to tap into.
10:10 PM | Comments (4) | Posted By Bob Cesca
The Most Popular Democrat In The World
Now that Senator Clinton's campaign is in serious trouble, it appears as if Senator Obama will once again be facing off against attacks from both Senator Clinton and her spouse: The Most Popular Democrat In The World Who Is Also The Most Popular Living Ex-President In The World.
If Senator Obama overcomes attacks from both Senator Clinton and The Most Popular Democrat In The World Who Is Also The Most Popular Living Ex-President In The World to win this nomination, he wil have accomplished a monumentally huge victory that will carry over into November. And the Clintons will have suffered the most crushing collective defeat of their careers.
09:34 PM | Comments (1) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Is Texas significant?
Wonder how Mark Penn is spinning the latest ARG poll in Texas?
48% Obama, 42% Clinton.
I'm sure that if these numbers continue to move in the direction numbers everywhere have been moving and continue to move, and they lose Texas, they'll find a way to explain that this state doesn't matter, either, except, of course, for the superdelegates they're courting who live there. Kos nails it:
That [the Clinton campaign] would even suggest a tactic that would sunder the Democratic Party, kicking off a vicious and destructive civil war, tells me that like Bill in the 90s, when our majorities in Congress and all around the country were decimated and the party's base left to wither and die, Hillary will put her own interests above those of their party. And to me, there's no greater sin in Democratic politics than that.So the Clinton campaign has graduated from saying that certain states don't matter, to saying certain voters don't matter, to now saying that the Democratic Party electorate doesn't matter.
12:27 PM | Comments (10) | Posted By JumpyPants
Clinton vs. Penn
Steve Benen nails it:
...the problem is hardly ever with what Hillary Clinton herself says. She’s sharp, on-message, and disciplined, rarely making the kind of verbal gaffe that hurts her campaign. It’s her surrogates that are the problem.
Absolutely right. I believe that people part ways with Senator Clinton when it comes to content. Yes, she's sharp, on-message and disciplined, but when she's all those things while defending her Iraq vote or attacking Senator Obama's oratory, voters run to Obama. They run especially fast when a Clinton surrogate says something idiotic.
08:44 AM | Comments (4) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Morning Awesome
07:48 AM | Comments (2) | Posted By Bob Cesca
February 14, 2008
Senator McSellout
I wrote this while liveblogging Tuesday night:
9:49PM Senator Obama used the term "Bush-McCain Republicans". One of the frames against Senator McCain ought to be how he sold out his principals to the Bush White House. Even on the McCain Amendment, he negotiated with Dick Cheney on torture and allowed the president to invalidate the whole thing with a signing statement. "McCain sold out to the Bushies." Bush-McCain.
I had no idea Senator McCain would sell out AGAIN on torture the following day. Read Arianna's take here.
05:39 PM | Comments (0) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Fire Mark Penn, Senator Clinton
"Could we possibly have a nominee who hasn't won any of the significant states -- outside of Illinois? That raises some serious questions about Sen. Obama."
I don't even know where to begin. Good luck winning over any superdelegates from insignificant states like (quoting Markos): "Colorado, Missouri, Washington, Minnesota, Virginia, Maryland, Maine, Delaware, Iowa, and Connecticut," etc.
In the general election, there's no reason why Senator Obama wouldn't win California, New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts. None what so ever. He'd be the sole Democrat running against Senator McCain in the general. Why wouldn't he win the Clinton primary states? Furthermore, Obama wouldn't just win these "states that count," he'd also have a strong shot at winning traditionally red states like South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama and -- possibly -- Kansas.
Then there's this bit of Mark Penn genius in the Wall Street Journal:
Mr. Penn yesterday released a memo saying that Mrs. Clinton leads in the "three largest, delegate-rich states remaining: Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania." He noted that they have 492 delegates, or 64% of the remaining total Mrs. Clinton needs for the nomination.
Unless the WSJ garbled the details of the memo, Penn is suggesting that Senator Clinton will somehow receive all 492 delegates -- 100% of the vote in all three states. Which is impossible.
UPDATE: What's the Kathy Bates line from Primary Colors? "Yes, I will destroy this village in order to save it."
NEW YORK TIMES: With every delegate precious, Mrs. Clinton’s advisers also made it clear that they were prepared to take a number of potentially incendiary steps to build up Mrs. Clinton’s count. Top among these, her aides said, is pressing for Democrats to seat the disputed delegations from Florida and Michigan, who held their primaries in January in defiance of a Democratic Party rules.
First, Senator Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan due to the party mandate. And second... three words: President John McCain. I would obviously still vote for Senator Clinton if she won this way, but that stuff I've written about supporting her during the general would no longer apply, I think. Senator Clinton, if she does this, will destroy the Democratic village and hand the Oval Office to John McCain.
But at least the Clintons will have "won" the nomination. There's that, at least.
02:27 PM | Comments (3) | Posted By Bob Cesca
What Would Mary Do?
The Kansas State High School Activities Association said referees reported that Michelle Campbell was preparing to officiate at St. Mary's Academy near Topeka on Feb. 2 when a school official insisted that Campbell could not call the game.The reason given, according to the referees: Campbell, as a woman, could not be put in a position of authority over boys because of the academy's beliefs.
Yes, America, we need school vouchers so that our tax dollars can fund misogynistic parochial jagoff factories like this one. And of course the namesake of the goddamn school -- Mary the Mother of God isn't in an authority position over men.
08:22 AM | Comments (7) | Posted By Bob Cesca
The Case For Senator Clinton
Joe Wilson wrote a really sharp endorsement of Senator Clinton here, with plenty of negatives against Senator Obama. If you're a supporter of Senator Clinton, it's a syllabus of fuel against Senator Obama. But, at a glance, the following points seemed odd:
Hillary knew this from experience, having spent the better part of the past 20 years fighting the Republican attack machine. She is a fighter.
She's fighter against Republicans, which is why she voted with the Republicans to fight in Iraq.
I was among the most prominent anti-war voices at the time -- and never heard about or from then Illinois State Senator Obama.
Joe Wilson has been a hero in this dark age, but with all due respect this line is weak and literally near-sighted. The media made damn sure that anti-war voices at that time were marginalized and ignored. It's no goddamn wonder, Ambassador. And for what it's worth, this reminds me of e-mails I receive from wingnuts who dismiss what I write based on my education and filmmaking career. "Feh. Who are you anyway? Go back to Kootztown College."
If you aren't fed up with the whole thing, go read it and come back to parse it in comments.
07:44 AM | Comments (3) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Morning Awesome
The latest awesome from Lee Stranahan.
07:37 AM | Comments (0) | Posted By Bob Cesca
February 13, 2008
Painful.it.is
Doesn't this band perform at 2, 4:30 and 6PM at the ampitheatre inside every amusement park in America?
Nonthreatening, painfully mainstream, annoyingly repetitive. Hillary '08!
And this shouldn't be a thing, but... they're all wearing brown shirts. If I was running the campaign, I'd pull this video immediately and hire someone cool to write a song.
02:21 PM | Comments (8) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Fear Mongering
The president was just on the TV attempting to scare the shit out of you. Attacks worse than 9/11 are being plotted by the evildoers against YOU at this very moment. And if the House doesn't pass telecom immunity, the terrsts will kill us all.
While I'm on this, shame on the Senate Democrats who voted for this bill. Empowering corporate malfeasance and enabling the president's whiny fear mongering is one thing, but helping to destroy the Fourth Amendment is unforgivable. We didn't work and fight for Democrats two years ago just so they could vote with the president on eavesdropping. Yesterday was a dark day for America.
Jay Rockefeller (D-WV),
Evan Bayh (D-IA),
Daniel Inouye (D-HI),
Tim Johnson (D-SD),
Herb Kohl (D-WI),
Mary Landrieu (D-LA),
Claire McCaskill (D-MO),
Mark Pryor (D-AR),
Blanche Lincoln (D-AR),
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA),
Ken Salazar (D-CO),
Tom Carper (D-DE),
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD),
Jim Webb (D-VA),
Ben Nelson (D-NE),
Bill Nelson (D-FL),
Kent Conrad (D-ND),
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
09:04 AM | Comments (4) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Morning Awesome
Happy 58th birthday to Peter Gabriel.
08:50 AM | Comments (1) | Posted By Bob Cesca
February 12, 2008
Liveblogging The Chesapeake Primary
I'm liveblogging the Chesapeake Primary over at the Huffington Post. Go!
07:23 PM | Comments (1) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Senator Obama Is To Ned Lamont As...
...well, you know the rest.
I've been ripped by Clinton supporters for grouping their candidate with Joe Lieberman (here and here). But Yglesias has a side-by-side election results map comparison between the Obama-Clinton results from Connecticut and the Lamont-Lieberman results. Shock-horror! They're eerily similar.
05:19 PM | Comments (0) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Oh Come On, Governor!
My governor, Ed Rendell:
"You've got conservative whites here, and I think there are some whites who are probably not ready to vote for an African-American candidate."
...and therefore black people are unelectable, is what he's suggesting.
All due respect to the governor, but this is pure horseshit. These "conservative whites" won't be voting for a Democrat in the first place. Jesus, governor. What a dumb thing so suggest. And that goes for Mr. Estrich, who wrote a similar thing.
Racist conservative whites? Oh please. Yeah, they're really lining up for liberals these days.
12:24 PM | Comments (5) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Malkin To Black People: "Whaaaah!"
Paraphrasing Malkin's creepy post: "But, but those black people at the Grammys get to say the n-word, so everyone should get to say it, too! Whaaah!"
I'll never understand this argument. It's N-Word Jealousy, which is just really, really weird.
And be sure to catch the bottom of the post in which Malkin agrees that Kelis Rogers-Jones' gold pants are more obscene than the n-word. Seriously? Seriously.
09:20 AM | Comments (2) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Morning Awesome
08:41 AM | Comments (0) | Posted By Bob Cesca
February 11, 2008
Memo to Hillary supporters in caucus states...
...she just dissed you.
Imagine you live in Washington or Maine, let's say. You just worked your butt off for the last couple months, writing letters to the editor, knocking on doors, making phone calls, all for the candidate you believe in: Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Then your caucus came, and you spent all day long in caucus pulling for Senator Clinton.
She didn't win, but, man, you worked hard for her. Then imagine reading this on CNN:
Clinton has publicly dismissed the caucus voting system since before Super Tuesday, seeking to lower expectations heading into a series of contests that played to Obama's advantage. His campaign features what many consider to be a stronger and more dedicated grassroots organization than Clinton's.Noting that "my husband never did well in caucus states either," Clinton argued that caucuses are "primarily dominated by activists" and that "they don't represent the electorate, we know that."
So how fast are you going out to razor-blade that Hillary bumper sticker off your car?
"They don't represent the electorate." Wow. Way to rally the troops there, HRC. That's just sad.
10:37 PM | Comments (3) | Posted By JumpyPants
Where does Mark Penn buy his crack?
The "GOP attack machine," Penn suggested, "skewed the perceptions of such distinguished public servants as Al Gore and John Kerry" in a way that left perceptions of them "out of touch with reality."Penn said that Hillary has "withstood" this process, while Obama would find that his independent support "would evaporate relatively quickly once he faced the Republicans." Penn added that the GOP "is already playing the national security card against Obama."
Mark, please. 1) Hillary "withstood" the process, but she sure as hell didn't "win" it. Look at the result of her health care initiative. Look at what happened to Congress. Governorships. 2) Hillary is running the same kind of campaign that Gore and Kerry ran in their respective elections. Obama is not. 3) Obama's hanging tough with all the crap you guys are slinging at him, and he's beating you by not slinging it back. Thanks to you and your factory of crap, he'll be more than ready to face the GOP.
10:32 PM | Comments (8) | Posted By JumpyPants
John.he.is
Featuring our friend and voice of Boo Boo Cheney: the multi-talented Marc Evan Jackson.
Lee Stranahan's version is just as awesome.
10:31 AM | Comments (2) | Posted By Bob Cesca
More about unity...
Bob's post below, jumping off from Digby, makes the important point.
And here's the thing: Clinton is, by any historical measure, not a uniter. She and her husband both have a long track record of sowing division and reaping the (short terms) rewards. Obama has been making this point on the campaign trail:
“Keep in mind, we had Bill Clinton as president when, in ’94, we lost the House, we lost the Senate, we lost governorships, we lost state houses,” he said. “And so, regardless of what policies they wanted to promote, they didn’t have a working majority to bring change about.”
More to the point, Clinton's modus operandi as a politician is to prepare for the negative, for the attack. This excellent diary at kos by davefromqueens lays out how the Clinton campaign has done a thorough, Rovian vetting job on Obama.
I urge you to read the whole diary, but here's the wrap-up:
Obama attracts that support because people of both parties and of all different political persuasions are sick and tired of the establishment, the corporate media, and Washington cocktail party insiders telling the American people what they can and can not do. They are sick and tired of these establishment politicians putting themselves ahead of the real interests of the American people.Obama symbolizes the return of people oriented politics, a person who wants to be President to help others, even if he is not as progressive as I would like him to be. He offers change after 28 years of either a Bush or Clinton in the White House. Yet the establishment and the insiders have attacked him relentlessly, led by the Clinton campaign.
Obama is battled tested. Obama is equipped to handle Republican type smears. He's already done it.
Bottom line: Obama is the unifier. And the voters are telling us that with their votes.
10:04 AM | Comments (1) | Posted By JumpyPants
Unifying The Party First
Digby makes an excellent point about the Democratic primary fracas:
Personally, I don't think we'll have a tie much longer. It's hard to see how either candidate can unify the country if they can't demonstrate that they can unify the Democratic Party. Something has to break and I suspect voters will be the ones to do it.
The task of unifying the party is a real opportunity for Senator Obama to prove his quality, and if this weekend was any indication, he's on his way.
09:04 AM | Comments (0) | Posted By Bob Cesca
The War Has Largely Ended
From Paddy who doesn't understand that the war has largely ended:
10-Feb-2008 US NAME NOT RELEASED YET08-Feb-2008
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET07-Feb-2008
US Petty Officer 1st Class Luis A. Souffront06-Feb-2008
US Sergeant Bradley J. Skelton05-Feb-2008
US Sergeant Timothy R. Van Orman
US Sergeant John C. Osmolski
US Specialist Miguel A. Baez
US Sergeant Rafael Alicearivera04-Feb-2008
US Specialist Christopher J. West
US Chief Petty Officer Nathan H. Hardy
US Chief Petty Officer Michael E. Koch
08:52 AM | Comments (2) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Landslide in Maine
Yglesias reminds us that, in October, Senator Clinton was supposed to destroy Senator Obama in Maine... 47-10.
08:44 AM | Comments (0) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Morning Awesome
08:26 AM | Comments (1) | Posted By Bob Cesca
February 10, 2008
So I was wrong, but in a good way
Obama didn't just barely beat Clinton. He won by the proverbial landslide: 59 to 41, with 79% reporting.
And as dansolomon clued me in on the comments below the comments below we should expect a win for Obama in Americans Abroad as well.
As Bob points out below, Patty Solis Doyle was purportedly canned because of a lack of ground coordination of the Clinton campaign's message. This is kind of shocking to me - I think the message ("experience, day one work start, roll up my sleeves") has been crystal clear to anyone with a tv, the internet and half a brain. I think the bigger issue that the Clinton campaign is reluctant to admit is that it's kind of a crappy message. I mean, are we to believe that any of these candidates got to where they are without working hard, and without a fair amount of experience? The problem isn't the message isn't being heard. The problem is the message isn't being valued.
Final point: we can only hope Bush continues to "critique" Obama in his loud and whiney voice as often as possible. It only makes the contrast that much more obvious. Come on Republicans, this is your shot at redemption: vote Obama!
07:38 PM | Comments (5) | Posted By JumpyPants
Maine Caucus Blockus
7:25PM
CNN calls Maine for Senator Obama.
Obama - 1,817 - 59%
Clinton - 1,263 - 41%
79% reporting
6:12PM
Current results in the big Maine caucus:
Obama - 1,305 - 57%
Clinton - 956 - 42%
59 percent of precincts reporting
Also, Senator Clinton has fired campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle and replaced her with Maggie Williams. The word is that there was no ground coordination on the campaign message.
And finally, I heard Senator Clinton on CNN again criticizing Senator Obama's "rhetorical flourishes" and lack of policy detail in his speeches. There's a lot to say here including an entire thing about how it drives me apeshit when I hear people saying "I don't know what he stands for" -- but I think I addressed this in the previous post.
If you want to know what Senator Clinton's or Senator Obama's positions and plans are, they're all right there on the campaign websites. In print and suitable for holding candidates accountable. So if it's augmented by inspiring "rhetorical flourishing"... awesome. That's balance, if you ask me.
06:12 PM | Comments (6) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Bush vs. Obama
President Bush says something ridiculous:
"I certainly don't know what he believes in. The only foreign policy thing I remember he said was he's going to attack Pakistan and embrace Ahmadinejad," Bush said.
By the way, President Bush in the same interview used the childish epithet "Democrat Party." Meanwhile, the Obama campaign fires back:
"Of course President Bush would attack the one candidate in this race who opposed his disastrous war in Iraq from the start. But Barack Obama doesn't need any foreign policy advice from the architect of the worst foreign policy decision in a generation," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton.
Boom goes the dynamite!
Yes... President George W. Bush. The James Buchanan to Obama's (or Clinton's) Lincoln. The Hoover to Obama's (or Clinton's) FDR. Just another forgotten dickhead president. He likes to talk about how historians won't be settled on his legacy until long after he's dead. Of course this is a self-deluded cop-out that will allow him to sleep at night. But what the president really ought to worry about is his successor entirely overshadowing his retarded presidency.
Democrat Party? Embrace Ahmadinejad? Fuck you, Mr. President.
05:59 PM | Comments (3) | Posted By Bob Cesca
He's Still Here! AHHH!
In this screen-grab, President Bush is engaged in a FOX News Sunday interview about:
a) Puppies
b) Rainbows
c) Puppies sliding down rainbows
d) Torture
Yes, he's still here, and still smirking during conversations about deadly serious issues. One day soon, when our soldiers are waterboarded and tortured in retaliation for his awful policies, will he be smiling and smirking?
03:42 PM | Comments (3) | Posted By Bob Cesca
About that delegate count
Are you as sick of I am at hearing people on the toob and in the supermarket checkout that even though Obama is winning, he's really losing? You know, because of those superdelegates.
Well, Real Clear Politics runs the numbers, and here's the headline:
Hillary's ahead by only 3 delegates. And that INCLUDES Super Delegates.
Obama has 1120. Clinton has 1123.
In other words, by Wednesday, nobody's going to be saying Clinton is winning.
Today, Maine has 34 delegates to allocate. I predict it's almost even, but that Obama wins slightly: 17 - 15. Virginia, Maryland, DC - 238 delegates at stake. Obama will sweep these votes, and clean up with delegates (I predict a 2 to 1 victory, with Obama getting 170 to Clinton's 68), pushing him ahead even counting on the superdelegates who swore allegiance to Hillary over a year ago - and many of whom, as Bob has been saying, will switch allegiance to the frontrunner when that becomes more clear.
Democrats Abroad vote that day, too, 7 delegates at stake, I have no clue.
Then Wisconsin (y'know, the state next to Illinois) and Hawaii (where Obama used to reside) will render up 121 delegates. Again, Obama will win, and I think he'll win something like, say, 71 to 50.
And then comes Texas and Ohio. Obama is getting major newspaper endorsements in both states (Rhode Island and Vermont vote the same day, I predict Clinton wins RI, Obama wins VT). But about TX and OH, where 389 delgates are at stake...
As I posted below, Hispanics in Texas are realizing they have a bit more in common with Obama than Clinton. I don't expect Hillary to have anything like a deciding win in either place - even if the election were held today. But after a month of Obama garnering victory after victory, running his stellar ads and doing his thing face-to-face with arena crowds...I just don't see how he doesn't lock this thing up around midnight on March 4.
And hey, that's about when Howard Dean said he thought things would be figured out...how about that?
02:20 PM | Comments (2) | Posted By JumpyPants
About Texas...
Some interesting facts about Obama's rising status in Texas, via Kos diarist kubla000:
State Rep. Pete Gallego, chairman of the Mexican American Legislative Caucus, has announced he is endorsing Barack Obama for president.In the California primary on Super Tuesday, Latino voters broke 2 to 1 for Clinton. Gallego said he saw no reason why, as voters get to know Obama better, that ratio would not shrink in Texas.
“Obama’s life story and his values are so much closer to the Latino community than any candidate other than Bill Richardson,” Gallego said.
“Part of what drives me is his life story. It’s a fascinating life story. It’s more than just the issues, it’s his values. I think Hispanics and South Texas should really be able to relate to him.”
Oh, and also:
The San Antonio Express Endorsed Obama
The Dallas Morning News Endorsed Obama
02:13 PM | Comments (3) | Posted By JumpyPants
Surge? Working!
BAGHDAD - A suicide car bomber targeted U.S.-allied fighters north of Baghdad on Sunday, killing at least eight civilians and wounding 20, Iraqi security officials said.
TIKRIT, Iraq (AFP)- A suicide car bombing killed 19 people and wounded 29 others as it ripped through a market place in a village in central Iraq on Sunday, police said.
The war? Largely ended!
12:02 PM | Comments (2) | Posted By Bob Cesca
Morning Awesome
09:49 AM | Comments (0) | Posted By Bob Cesca
