« I'm So Stupid! | Main | Morning Awesome »
February 16, 2008
Does Winning Mean "Winning"?
Not according to Mark "My Head Is So Far Up My Ass It's Coming Out My Neck" Penn. Here's Penn's latest lobbying effort to get himself heavily medicated and/or force Hillary Clinton onto the Democratic party:
“Winning Democratic primaries is not a qualification or a sign of who can win the general election. If it were, every nominee would win because every nominee wins Democratic primaries.”
Okay, in the true spirit of Clintonian politics, let's parse that quote, shall we? Penn is saying:
1. Winning Democratic primaries DOES NOT MEAN you can win the general election and THUS
2. The implication is that the person who gets the most votes, most delegates, most states in the Democratic primary actually SHOULD NOT BE the nominee because the nominee won't win. THEREFORE:
3. What the DNC should do is actually nominate the person who gets fewer votes/delegates/states in the primary process.
Okay, okay, Mark. Bring on Democratic Nominee Joe Biden!
Posted By JumpyPants | February 16, 2008 10:20 PM | DIGG ME!
Comments
That's nice. Once again they point out that we don't know what we're doing.
What's next? I think the only thing they have left is "if you vote for Barack Obama, the terrorists win."
Posted by: Nanotyrannus ![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.bobcesca.com/nav-commenters.gif)
at February 17, 2008 01:43 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
