I have to say this is kind of a dumb post (as well as the one beneath it)--and not befitting the thoughtfulness and genius of Mr. Cesca (no wonder it didn't come from him)--I am not a fan of doing the same thing the right-wingers and BBQ media do to Obama--

but,I vote for "Lie-y McBullshit"

I agree with JG.

But write in one I saw at TPM: Grandpa Bonkers.

Ordinarily, I'd agree with JG but given the seriousness of the current world situation, forget it.

In my world, 71 year old men and women are the wise ones -- the ones who are supposed to be level-headed setting the example for the rest of us idiots (I'm 47) so that we too can be that wise at their age.

John McCain doesn't come close to having the wisdom and grace that my father-in-law, who is his age, has - not by any stretch of the imagination and The Man Wants to be Our President?

Perish the thought...

So my vote because I am such a nice person would have to be #2 -- not because the others don't apply but because - well what JG said.

I'm partial to Smeary McRatfuck, myself.

I'd have to go with #1 (with one small change) - Crotchedy McBrainfart - just seems fitting.

I believe that most of the names miss the mark ...
McSpongeBath says it all.

"Ordinarily, I'd agree with JG but given the seriousness of the current world situation, forget it.

I hear you, but the issues are on our side--we don't need to stoop down to the right-wing's level. I am all for hammering McCain as unfit to lead for myriad reasons (his temperament as well as his new and ever changing stances on the issues)--but name calling (while they point towards the truth) reduces the argument in my opinion--and again, the issues are on our side.

I am sick of the distraction from the right wing echo chamber--with an assist from the BBQ media. And again, this is what Bob is talking about when he criticizes the BBQ media--if they would only spell out the candidates issues without all the blur and BS, yes Obama would be way ahead--that's why I love it when the media continually asks, "why isn't Obama ahead by more?" Well the answer to the vilager's question is that if they actually covered the issues instead of building the great wall of duh, then yes, Obama would be ahead by more.