« They're The Mafia | Main | That NBC Poll on the Public Option »
August 19, 2009
For Snowe and Enzi Maybe?
Gibbs tosses cold water on shutting out the Republicans:
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said the administration remains committed to drawing Republican support for the bill, particularly in the Senate.“I don't know why we would short-circuit that now,” Gibbs told reporters.
He said the White House believes some Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee “are still working in a constructive way to get reform through the Senate and ultimately to the president's desk.”
Aggravating, I know. But I can't help but to go back to the number 60. There are only 58 healthy Democrats right now. 58. Not enough to break the filibuster, unless Kennedy and Byrd are well enough to vote several months from now. And by all accounts, a reconciliation vote will do much more harm than good.
So the White House needs two Republicans to vote against the filibuster. What would you do if you were the White House? Speaking for myself, I wouldn't want to be the White House right now.
Filed under: Healthcare || Robert Gibbs
Posted By Bob Cesca | August 19, 2009 2:45 PM
Comments
Bob, why do you think a reconciliation vote will do more harm? It's not like the Democrats are going to get any Republican votes.
Posted by: Broadway Carl™
at August 19, 2009 3:19 PM
Gee, here's a thought - MAKE them f-ing filibuster! Make it physically painful for these a-holes to hold this up. I'm so sick of the Harry Reid approach of waving the white flag anytime someone mentions "filibuster." Make them do it!! Eventually 1 or 2 of them will break.
Posted by: Leeman67
at August 19, 2009 3:25 PM
>>What would you do if you were the White House?
I would pledge a campaign promise to RINO Snowe and Collins. They are from fucking Maine! It is bordered by Canada for Christ's(Thor's) sake. Shit, I don't think Snowe or Collins even had challenges last election.
Posted by: GItheJOE
at August 19, 2009 3:32 PM
Also, I would remind everyone of the stimulus bill. The WH wanted strong bipartisan support, they pushed that the entire time, even as it became clear there would be zero. The vote came around, 3 Senators voted for the bill. And Obama still signed it. It's not like it this doesn't get 60 votes, he'll veto. Also, frankly, he's not just negotiating with Republicans--he's not even mainly negotiating with Republicans: Baucus is a Dem, after all.
@Leeman67: Unfortunately, I don't think you have to actually physically filibuster anymore, but I could be wrong.
Posted by: J
at August 19, 2009 3:35 PM
I say go for reconcilliation. But, only take that route AFTER having forced the GOP to fillibuster. The mere threat of the philly has been enough for the Dems to back down time and time again.
I say it's time to call their bluff. Get the GOP on CSPAN hour after hour railing against the "death panels" and the mobile euthanasia squads and whatever crap they can come up with. When the American public have had a good, long look at the absurdity of GOP obstructionism, then go for reconciliation route.
Posted by: Canadian Simon
at August 19, 2009 3:43 PM
It is possible that whenever the WH speaks publicly that they are not always speaking to us - the public. They do have to go back to the negotiating table with these people.
It's politics folks.
Posted by: Allonfla
at August 19, 2009 4:11 PM
Am I the only person that's thinking the Repubs are purposely holding out in the hopes that Kennedy and/or Byrd will drop dead in the interim?
And also, could it be that Gibbs is still just saying that the WH wants to play nice with the Repubs to make them ultimately look like the assholes for taking the ball home?
Posted by: pea
at August 19, 2009 7:57 PM
"And by all accounts, a reconciliation vote will do much more harm than good."
By whose accounts? What harm? You just pulled that statement out from somewhere without any explanation. If "all accounts" claim that it would do more harm than good, I would think it would be pretty easy for me to find one example. But I haven't. I have learned, though, that Democrats used reconciliation in 1993.
So again I ask, what harm will it do, and who says?
Posted by: banks
at August 19, 2009 8:50 PM
Olympia Snowe did a walkabout in downtown Bangor yesterday, to listen to constituents about Health Care. It was covered by the Bangor Daily News today:
http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/116908.html?utm_source=BDN+News+Updates&utm_campaign=1752bf90bf-RSS_MORNINGUPDATE_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email
If you read the comments section afterward, you'll see what we're up against here in Northern Maine. Pretty sad. Southern Maine has a more positive attitude though.
Posted by: mrspeel2
at August 20, 2009 11:55 AM



