Congress Economy Food

Meanwhile, House GOP Proposes Even Bigger Cuts to SNAP

While no one is watching because they’re focused on recurring nontroversies in the media, the House of Representatives is currently debating the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013 which carries with it changes that will occur through fiscal 2018, and included in the current version of the bill being pushed by House conservatives is an even bigger cut to food stamps than we’ve already seen.

From the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

The proposed legislation would cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as the Food Stamp Program) by almost $21 billion over the next decade, eliminating food assistance to nearly 2 million low-income people, mostly working families with children and senior citizens. The proposal reduces total farm bill spending by an estimated $39.7 billion over ten years, so more than half of its cuts come from SNAP. The SNAP cuts are more than $4 billion larger than those included in last year’s House Agriculture Committee bill.

But that’s not all.

The cuts proposed by House Republicans would come on top of an automatic reduction that will occur near the end of this year for another shocking reason.

The bill’s SNAP cuts would come on top of an across-the-board reduction in benefits that every SNAP recipient will experience starting November 1, 2013. On that date, the increase in SNAP benefits established by the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) will end, resulting in a loss of approximately $25 in monthly SNAP benefits for a family of four. Placing the SNAP cuts in this farm bill on top of the benefit cuts that will take effect in November is likely to put substantial numbers of poor families at risk of food insecurity.

It’s astonishing that the 2009 American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (the stimulus) will still be providing food to poor families through the end of 2013.

In some states the cuts proposed by House Republicans would lead to a reduction in benefits totaling as much or more than half of what they currently receive, and according to the Congressional Budget Office, as many as 210,000 children could lose their free school lunches because they’re tied to SNAP benefits.

As for the idea that SNAP benefits are somehow dragging down the economy, the CBO has also projected that the currently-elevated participation rate in the SNAP program will “fall back to 2008 levels in coming years and that SNAP costs as a share of the economy will fall back to their 1995 level by 2019″ because of the improving economy.

  • bbcaaat

    Thank God for the Christian party protecting America from harm.

  • KABoink_after_wingnut_hacker

    But we feed more of our citizens in prison than any other country on the planet and have more guns, bullets & bombs than the next ten nations combined. Meanwhile small businesses like GE don’t have to pay a single cent in taxes and haven’t for years.
    Is this a great nation or what?

  • muselet

    House conservatives are evil.

    There, I said it.


    • bbcaaat

      Can I correct you? The House republicans are anything BUT conservative, it’s the Democratic party representatives who are conservative (by the honest definition of the word).

      • muselet

        Fair enough. In my defense, I was using Ashby’s construction (“… the bill being pushed by House conservatives is an even bigger cut …”) to make the point.


  • Ned F

    Somewhere, somehow, there is an undeserving person out there (not white nor southern), getting 40 dollars worth of food a month from the government, and we all no there is no free lunch. I guess you could cut corporate sugar, corn, and farm subsidies, but how would they survive?

  • bphoon

    Seems to me that, like adequate air to breathe, at least a secure, base subsistence-level food supply should be considered a fundamental human right. It is a travesty that, in the richest country on the planet, people–any people–through no fault of their own should go hungry. We waste more food than some African countries have available for their populations.

    Of course, the plight of people living in poverty is the very last on the GOP’s priority list. As long as corporate, industrial food producers get their government welfare, all is well with the world. If a few hundred thousand children have to go hungry in order to support that, well their parents should just go out and get better jobs. Cuz there’s so many of them available, you know.