Congress

Rep. Stephen Lynch’s Righteous Rant on Benghazi-Gate and the Fake Email Scandal

JM Ashby
Written by JM Ashby

Representative Stephen Lynch (D-MA) gets the quote of the day for unleashing on the so-called Clinton email scandal which no one can actually explain during an interview with Boston Herald Radio.

LYNCH: I haven’t heard a word about Colin Powell. I haven't heard a word about Condoleezza Rice. In our investigations we went to both of those former secretaries of state and, Colin Powell, we tried to do an investigation of his testimony before the U.N. on weapons of mass destruction.

You know what, Colin Powell didn't have a goddamn email available for us. There was zero. Zero. Hillary Clinton, what was it, 30,000 she turned in? It was the same thing with Condoleezza Rice; not a goddamn email that was useful to the committee. And no one wants to talk about that because it's being run by a Republican chairman.

So why is it OK that Colin Powell, you know, in launching a war in Iraq, to not have a single available email, it’s OK for that, but Hillary Clinton, you know, she turns over 30,000 of them and you know that’s not enough, we want more information?

Lynch goes on to point out that people, between hacks and politically-motivated inquisitions, are simply going to stop writing their thoughts down in emails. I'm sure he's right.

This is just another example of how Republicans have transformed the concept of government oversight into a political sideshow that stifles legitimate needs for oversight. How can Congress possibly pay enough attention to legitimate problems if all time and energy is sucked out of the chamber by a 4-year long witch hunt?

(h/t The Hill, audio via Buzzfeed)

  • Aynwrong

    IOKIYAR!

    Well said and exactly right.

    • Joe gideon

      Oh, I didn’t realize you were posting on OPPOSITE DAY.

      • Aynwrong

        Huh? I was pointing out how right the Rep. was.

  • muselet

    Yesterday, Kevin Drum summarized emailgate and came away puzzled:

    What am I missing? I don’t begrudge the press covering emailgate. Republicans are all over it, which makes it a newsworthy issue whether we like it or not. And there has been an inspector general’s investigation, as well as an ongoing FBI investigation. That makes it newsworthy too.

    But I still want to know: what exactly is being investigated at this point? If you just want to argue that Clinton showed bad judgment, then go to town. That’s a legitimate knock on a presidential candidate. But actual malfeasance? Where is it?

    Well, the malfeasance is that she’s a Clinton and she’s running for President, but nobody can come right out and admit that. Instead, the GOP—and the Villagers who took such an intense dislike to the Clintons back in the ’90s—will bay after the caricature of Hillary Clinton they’ve built up inside their vacuous little heads until she confesses to something, anything.

    –alopecia

    • essar1

      Lynch…and Drum, nailed it completely. And if anyone needs still more examples of the fact that there is NO SUCH THING as a “liberal media”, they need their head examined.

      • muselet

        The liberal media don’t exist, but the Clinton Rules do.

        –alopecia

        • Joe gideon

          ..and you can keep your doctor and your medical plan…

    • Badgerite

      “Dislike”. That is one way to put it. Hate filled phobia might be another.

  • Badgerite

    Oh, I can explain that to him. The posture of the Bush administration during its entire tenor was that of the Cosa Nostra. E-mails? They wouldn’t even turn over a schedule of who had visited the White House during Dick Cheney’s “What can we do for you” confab with the oil companies which included representatives of BP.
    I believe we saw what they did for them during the BP Horizon oil spill in the Gulf.
    Did I mention warrantless wiretapping by the NSA? To stop that being completely within the executive branch required the threat of a mass exodus from the Department of Justice and the FBI including the head of the FBI immediately before the election of 2004.
    So he is essentially complaining that Hilary Clinton has been too forthcoming with them? I agree. She should just kick them in the nuts. Lord knows they deserve it.