If you didn’t watch Rachel Maddow’s debate with Pat Buchanan tonight, go here and check it out then come on back (embedding the bulky MSNBC video player makes my intertubes seize up).
Pat repeats the same tired argument that Judge Sotomayor is unqualified for the Supreme Court and therefore doesn’t deserve the nomination — in fact, she’s been elevated, in Pat’s estimation, based solely on race and not intellect. (We can thank, in part, Jonathan Turley for helping to create the “she’s not intellectual” criticism.) Never mind that she has more judicial experience than any Supreme Court justice in modern history.
But back to Pat.
His racist hypocrisy knows no bounds.
While pissing all over Judge Sotomayor’s qualifications, judicial record, accomplishments and achievements, Pat Buchanan thinks Sarah Palin! is qualified to be President of the United States.
Sarah Palin who couldn’t accurately describe the duties of the vice president during a nationally televised vice presidential candidate debate. A woman who’s less intellectually curious than George W. Bush, and has less experience and fewer credentials than the worst president in American history. And Pat Buchanan thinks she’s the best Republican ever. Presidential material.
But Judge Sotomayor is intellectually unqualified for the Supreme Court, right? And Sarah Palin is qualified for the highest office in the land.
What conclusion can we draw from this inconsistency? Easy. Pat Buchanan hates brown people. Read his latest awful editorial and tell me this isn’t true. If he doesn’t hate brown people, he simply, then, believes white males are far superior in almost every way (to be fair, he admits to Maddow that blacks can run fast).
He goes on to complain that white people are being discriminated against and this is a terrible crime. What Pat Buchanan will never admit is that for every one Frank Ricci, there are literally thousands of Americans with dark skin or “exotic” names who are being held back or punished or imprisoned for no other reason than their race or ethnicity. It’s been that way for hundreds of years here.
This naturally doesn’t make discrimination against white people “okay.” In an imperfect system, though, correcting our massive racial imbalance means that, unfortunately, a few Frank Ricci types fall through the cracks. But if people like Pat Buchanan would embrace the spirit of correcting the imbalance, we’d be able to fix these cracks.
Ultimately, however, Pat Buchanan is an old white man who is clinging desperately — and desperately is the appropriate adverb — to the past, as Rachel pointed out. He fears the inevitable browning of America and so he’s lashing out more and more often with this venomous, divisive, hate-mongering language.
The serious question here is whether MSNBC will continue to finance his clearly white supremacist views. If there’s anyone in America who doesn’t deserve more air time, it’s people like Pat Buchanan. They had their time and they failed. Their reign was destructive and a blight on American history. They have no place in the discourse anymore.
Time to step aside, Pat. For the good of the country.