Supreme Court

SCOTUS Hammers Another Nail Into Public Financing Coffin

If you are someone who believes publicly financed elections are the best hope for removing special interests from our politics, the Supreme Court reiterated today that they do not agree with you.

The conservative majority of the Supreme Court on Monday struck down an Arizona campaign finance law that offered political candidates facing well-funded opponents a subsidy to "level the playing field" and protect from public corruption.

Chief Justice John Roberts and the conservative majority agreed with the five conservative politicians and two political action committees who argued that the law stifled free speech, claiming it meant they were punished if they raised too much money because the government would subsidize their opponents.

But Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, writing a dissent on behalf of the minority of the court, said that there was a major problem with the decision by her colleagues -- Arizona's matching funds provision "does not restrict, but instead subsidizes, speech."

Only in Conservative Bizzaro World does leveling the playing field mean punishing those who are ahead.