According to Conspiracy Theorist in Chief Alex Jones, federal henchmen have infiltrated militias and convinced them to launch of a series of foolish escapades like the ongoing occupation of a bird watching sanctuary in Oregon.
The Bundy militia, you see, has been carefully manipulated from the shadows by Emperor Palpatine President Obama.
He said that “the timing of this now allows the whole debate to not be about the gun-grab, to not be about all the gun control, to not be about the victim disarmament, but to be about citizens with guns taking over buildings,” adding that the family the militia members are claiming to defend don’t even want them involved.
“We are literally walking into their trap and you know there’s provocateurs there on the ground,” Jones added, before claiming that “these takeovers” will give a reason for “feds from all over the country to infiltrate, stir stuff up, God knows do what, I mean, it’s textbook.”
Is this a conspiracy within a conspiracy? A conspiracy based on a conspiracy? A theory based on a theory? Can one exist without the other?
It's certainly a conspiracy theory to say the federal government has intentionally supported right wing militias to serve as a distraction from a "gun grab," but the existence of a looming gun grab is also a conspiracy theory.
One conspiracy leads to another in this bottomless rabbit hole. Jones has no obligation to take responsibility for the consequences of his rhetoric or admit that he was wrong as long as the conspiracy lives.
When President Obama leaves office, the next president will become the new face of the global conspiracy even if that president is a Republican. There must always be a conspiracy.